Den of Geek

Heroes season 4 episodes 1 & 2 review

James Hunt


The pressure's on for Heroes to deliver with season 4. So how did the opening double-header do?

Published on Sep 24, 2009

Ever since a promising opening season ended with a whimper rather than a bang, Heroes has repeatedly failed to find its footing, offering promise of intriguing plots and ideas but never managing to deliver anything spectacular. Season 3 spent far too much time wrapped up in its own mythology, but concluded with the promise of a new direction - which is especially good, because Heroes has all-too-often lacked any direction at all.

It's unfortunate, then, that things don't really seem to have changed at all. The season opened with a double length premiere, which is instantly worrying. Heroes has almost never concerned itself with making individual episodes rewatchable, tailoring itself explicitly to sequential viewing. On one hand, this means no ‘monster of the week' episodes, but on the other, it means every episode blurs together as a continuing morass of subplots that never quite coalesce - and a 90-minute opener offers no real benefits in terms of the story that can be told.

Indeed, it has the awkward effect of making Nathan (who has by far one of the most compelling stories going on) and Angela disappear halfway through the episode with no explanation or justification.

Season 3 also suffered massively with plots shifting constantly from one episode to the next, and the Season 4 opener has to do some reworking of its own. The last time we saw Tracy, she was being set up as the villain of the series - a plot rapidly side-stepped by the conclusion of this episode - and when we last saw the extended Petrelli family, they were going to set up the company as ‘a family', yet Clare, Peter and Nathan appear to have no interest in being part of it, leaving Noah and Angela to go it alone.

Admittedly, these are plausible outcomes to those plots, but only in the sense that they obey the laws of reality, not because they seem like probable or natural developments. It contributes to a sense that the series is freewheeling and no-one's really sure where it's going.

So, while Noah gets back to setting up the company and Angela directs clandestine phone calls, everyone's favourite indestructible girl Claire has been placed in a sort of Buffy Season 4-meets-Veronica Mars plot. I understand what they were trying to subvert the whole ‘irritating roommate' trope by having her die in a shocking manner (although at this point, the subversion of that plot has become the norm...) but let's be honest, I can't be the only person who was actively hoping she was only around as cannon fodder, can I?

Claire's new friend was a far more compelling character, purely because she managed to have an atypical personality without the work "quirk" being branded on her forehead, which is unusual for US drama. Unfortunately, it seems that right now her main purpose is to be Claire's latest sidekick, following yet another accidentally-witnessed mangling. Haven't we seen that plot before?

Indeed, if you're looking for new plots, Heroes might not be the best show to watch. Once again, we have to deal with Hiro's powers freaking out. Once again, we see Peter returning to his job and trying to live a normal life. Once again, the previous season's villain gets shuffled off remarkably quickly to make the current one seem threatening.

Parkman, meanwhile, gets to be the star of this season's suspiciously X-Men-like plot (a staple of Heroes since the start) as it seems that Sylar's personality managed to cross over into Matt's body during last season's attempted mind-wipe.

It might be rather similar to an existing Xavier/Magneto plot, but that aside, it's probably the most human and compelling story thread introduced in the episode. Matt typifies the ‘normal person with extraordinary abilities' concept, and his temptation to abuse those powers is believable and real.

Zachary Quinto's appearances are more confident and threatening than ever, and with the critical smash, Star Trek, under his belt, it's not hard to imagine why. Last season, Sylar was over-used. This time around, his sparing appearances are the best moments of the entire episode. The promise here almost makes up for the way Matt's colleagues were so easily able to ignore him shouting at people who weren't there.

Similarly brilliant is Nathan's dawning realisation that he might not be who he thinks he is. It's impossible to tell where this plot is going, but it makes for enjoyably tense viewing and it's a pity that it had to disappear without reference after the first half of the two-parter. It's perhaps the only genuinely original idea in the episode, so let's hope it's explored further.

So far, the series has shown no sign of bringing back Mohinder. This is a good thing. Not because Mohinder is particularly poor, but because Heroes has often suffered to fit its sprawling cast into the story that it wants to tell, and it makes perfect sense to keep some of them away from the screen until there's a use for them.

Unfortunately, we aren't freed from the horrible opening monologues, and a particularly poor one was delivered by Robert Knepper, ostensibly as a graveside eulogy but unconvincingly so, given how it pertained far more to the montage of shots beneath it. Ah, well. Heroes wouldn't be Heroes without the meaningless intro and outro voiceovers.

And so, we come to Robert Knepper's carnival of the damned. Although the fake Olde Worlde accents are already grating and tattoo-based powers are a relentlessly terrible idea, there is at least some story promise in the characters, and the mystery behind their compass is a decent one to start off the series.

Knepper's scene in the past with Hiro was another good moment, where he demonstrated how causality can be bent, putting new rules on the series' time travelling, and indeed, Hiro's painfully familiar ‘wonky powers' plot is almost worth suffering through to see what the carnival's plan for him is - though while I'm on the subject, Hiro's "I'm dying" revelation was hilariously unconvincing. If I were Ando, I'd have at least asked for some details. What, exactly, is Hiro dying of? Nosebleeds?

So, that's two episode's worth of Heroes. Some good, some average, but as usual, perhaps a bit more rubbish than it's willing to acknowledge. There are some steps in the right direction, though, and if the plots can stay coherent from one episode to the next, there's no reason this couldn't be the best series of Heroes yet. Let's hope they've learnt the right lessons.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Better
Posted By Mav3000 1 September 24, 2009 08:11:04 AM

I think the premiere did a decent enough job of re-aligning the disjointed plots of Season 3. I think Clare is still a pointless and annoying character. The Guitar Hero advert was shameless, and her stereotypical friend having dark hair and a dark name can only suggest a dark side to be revealed. Peter's speed was unrealistic when fighting Ray Park with knives - where did his knife skills come from? Tracey's watered down character is totally inplausible - how she can be water-based yet still human is just rediculous. Hiro's character is still annoying, but Sylar, Matt and Nathan were interesting. The carnival owner (Robert Knepper not Ray Park) is an interesting character, and is a welcome addition (loved T-Bag in Prison Break), and their accents are Irish and English (not 'old world'). However, the tattoo-based foreseight is unrealistic, and if Sullivan is transported by his dad to the past, how does he return?! Still too many far-fetched ideas for my liking, but an improvement nonetheless.

Re: Heroes season 4 episodes 1 & 2 review
Posted By cordas 1 September 24, 2009 10:02:12 AM

I actually quite enjoyed this episode, and find most of the criticisms in this review to be bizarre... Apparently slowing down a bit and paying attention to characters, motivations and developing plausible plot for them is a bad idea now? *HUH* OK so you don't like Claire big deal... she seems to be on everyone's list as 'must hate' not exactly sure why (if you discount the bullsheet plot they gave her in the last season, but then they did that for every character), the actress is good, she plays girl in peril very well and her super power plays to that quite nicely. I like the fact that she is trying to reclaim her life and not be some superspy/whatever the eff she was last season. My biggest gripes with the double bill where the Nathan/Sylar bit, just because I would have left it a bit longer before you started to play that story. Have Sylar messing with Matt (which was superbly well done) and leave it at that, in the next episode or 2 have Nathan giving tiny Sylaresque quirks but keep them very subtle. As for the Carnival, they really should have put a bit more thought into it, boss bloke has some telekentic type power (moving earth) and some bizarre tattoo power (that seems to much carte blanche super power at the moment, it has plot device written all over it and that worries me). I am still to be convinced about Hiro/Ando, but I like that they seem to be taking control of Hiro's hugely abusable power... And come on how stupid do you think Ando (and the audience) is to have to spell out how someone who is suffering from nosebleeds and killer headaches might be told by doctors he is dying. I bet even the dumbest American can think brain tumour without having to say it!

Re: Heroes season 4 episodes 1 & 2 review
Posted By cordas 1 September 24, 2009 10:05:32 AM

P.S. What's with the criticism of the end of the 1st season.. It ticked every box it needed to tick as a season finale and did it well... At the time I seem to remember everyone loving the ending, its only when it became 'cool' to hate Heroes that some 'people' seemed to think that it made them 'supercool' to revise their views and hate the end of the 1st series. Don't blame that for the bull droppings that season 2 turned into!

Re: Heroes season 4 episodes 1 & 2 review
Posted By Codgin 1 September 24, 2009 11:43:10 AM

The end of the first series was a disaster, the fight was medicore, all the hype building it up was shattered in seconds, typical and no real Cliffhanger, personally they should have let the bomb go off, that way we could have worked torwards the future we seen in season 1, would have been brillant, lesson 1 of time travel, the future can not change, you can only be prepared for it! Anyway back to point Season 4 opener was enjoyable enough, the Guitar Hero scene made me quiver with disgust but the knife fight with peter and darth maul was one of the best iv seen on heroes, one of the better starts for the series, season 3 voulme 4 was also good but was compelty destroyed the ep after *shakes head*, thankfully that wasnt the case this time

Re: Heroes season 4 episodes 1 & 2 review
Posted By drakul 1 September 25, 2009 01:04:26 AM

Well I LOVED it. A nice slow boil for an opening, hopefully for a great new season.

Re: Heroes season 4 episodes 1 & 2 review
Posted By anon1991 1 September 25, 2009 12:02:36 PM

Well I personally thought that season4 has improved. For one the introduction of that carnival owner shows some promise for a good plot. I feel that the guy could be an empath which could be why he was interested when that bloke told him about Peter and hence the two distinct and different powers he has. And the Peter/Darth duel was awesome, one of the best duels so far in heroes. hopefully this season is much better than the rest.....

Re: Heroes season 4 episodes 1 & 2 review
Posted By Anyanka 1 September 27, 2009 04:20:04 AM

I'm calling it right now; Claire's new buddy is a psycho stalker who killed her original roommate.

Re: Heroes season 4 episodes 1 & 2 review - continuity anyone?
Posted By jOtMe 1 September 28, 2009 08:39:13 PM

The review above seems a bit harsh and the gripes it articulates seem to over look the really important critique of the season 3 finale and the first two episodes of season 4; that the writers of this show seem to have forgotten their own mythology: For example, we all saw Nathan's gruesome murder by Sylar, which in my personal opinion was actually an improvement on the Nathan character overall (Nathan seems to behave most irrationally at every turn and needed to be put down). However, wouldn't it have made more sense for Claire's powers of cell regeneration to be used in this instance to restore Nathan the way they were used earlier in the season to restore Noah Bennet? I honestly, can't tell whether this oversight was intended or if it's just gross negligence. Any thoughts? Of course, if they had done this, the whole Sylar in Matt's head thing wouldn't be possible, but the integrity of the show (which I still find enjoyable) would be intact (sort of). Of course, there are countless other examples but I just think this one is so incredibly HUGE that I thought I would address it.
Post a Comment
 

Heroes

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Broadband

Mobile Broadband

Compare over 100 mobile broadband & broadband deals online!

Mobile Phones

LG ArenaHTC Magic

Compare over 250 mobile phones &
52,000 deals!

Click Here