Amazon.co.uk Widgets
Den of Geek

Alternate Cover: Who doesn't watch Watchmen?

James Hunt


Frank Miller’s Spirit already demonstrated perfectly well why you might not want to see Watchmen

James loves Watchmen. James doesn't want to see the Watchmen movie. And here's why.

Published on Mar 2, 2009

It might surprise you to learn this, but as a comics fan, I have no interest in seeing the Watchmen movie.

It’s a position that often raises a few eyebrows. After all, Watchmen is one of the greatest comics of all time. Why WOULDN’T I want to see it? When you think about it, it’s not really a hard decision.

Frank Miller’s Spirit already demonstrated perfectly well why you might not want to see Watchmen. The beauty of Eisner’s comics was never anything to do with the pulpy characters – it was all about the design of the page, the flow of the storytelling, the very act of Eisner re-inventing a medium even as he worked within it. You can try to make a film reflect that, but the one thing you can’t do is copy it.

And that’s the same for Watchmen. You can translate Watchmen to the screen – you could even be more faithful than Snyder has been - but as with any adaptation, something will be lost in the process. The thing about Watchmen is that it’s a piece of work about its own medium. Move it to another, and you’ve lost the very thing that made it important in the first place.

That’s not to say I’m above adaptations – after all, I enjoyed V For Vendetta, also by Alan Moore, because it adapted the source material in a way that made it relevant to today – an interesting, (if imperfect and inferior) version of the story, making something new from the same basic elements. By his own admission, Watchmen is nothing more than Snyder attempting to get people to read the graphic novel – and hey, I’m way ahead of him.

Those defending Snyder’s work have said that just as Watchmen deconstructed superhero comics, Snyder now deconstructs superhero films, but to say that is to miss one simple fact – virtually all the big budget comics movies ever made are already post-Watchmen. They’ve been deconstructed already. Watchmen was a bomb dropped on the superhero, and whether you’re aware of it or not, the concept hasn’t been the same since.

And further to that, one thing we have to remember about Watchmen is that even though it’s one of comics’ most holy cows, it should be kept in mind that it is getting on for being 25 years old. The points it made – at least, some of them - have been well-heeded, and built upon. Watchmen is a compellingly-written story, but deprived of its context, that’s all it can ever be – and there are plenty of those around already.

So come release day, I won’t be first in line. I won’t be in line at all. I’m not saying you shouldn’t go, nor would I judge you for seeing it – but this is one case where the book isn’t just better than the film – it makes the film unnecessary.

James writes Alternate Cover every Monday at Den Of Geek. His previous column can be found here.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Alternate Cover: Who doesn't watch Watchmen?
Posted By stuxmusic 1 March 2, 2009 12:01:28 PM

Some points of this I agree with and some points I just don't. The main thing that got me was when you said "You can try to make a film reflect that, but the one thing you can’t do is copy it." about the spirit. Well, I'm sorry but, when did Miller try to copy the style of The Spirit at all in that film? He really didn't, so the comment seems unecessary.

Re: Alternate Cover: Who doesn't watch Watchmen?
Posted By jrhunt 1 March 2, 2009 02:45:25 PM

Fair enough. My point was, you can't translate what makes The Spirit special to the screen, because what makes it special is the fact that it's on a page in the first place. Any Watchmen film has to contend with a similar quandary.

Re: Alternate Cover: Who doesn't watch Watchmen?
Posted By moakle 1 March 2, 2009 03:09:16 PM

Can I suggest a slightly pervy reason to go and see it at the cinema? The sight of Dreiberg and Laurie getting it on in live action. I'll be the one in the back row.

Re: Alternate Cover: Who doesn't watch Watchmen?
Posted By Kilboy 1 March 2, 2009 08:48:49 PM

No one is going to sell me that Watchmen can't work onscreen. Well, maybe not as a film... that's a tricky one. I always thought it would be perfect for an HBO miniseries or something. I mean, a lot of those effects could be done on the cheap (it's cool that Zach rebuilt Crudup in the computer... but couldn't you just have painted the dude blue? Really? Would that really compromise the character?) and the episodic nature of a series would appropriately reflect the episodic nature of not only comic books in general, but this story in particular. I disagree that much of the subtext of the original material has to be lost, but I do see that much of it seems to have been, due to the money and expectations heaped upon the large-scale project ("Ok, Zach, you get the greenlight, but here's the deal... you call them the Watchmen in the movie, not the Crimebusters or whatever. For this kinda money, I want kids calling them the goddam Watchmen so they don't get confused.") I think that a faithful adaptation was possible—granted, with some modification (this is sort fo a must with any adaptation)—but middle-America cineplexes were probably not the best choice in venue. The most profitable? Definately.

Re: Alternate Cover: Who doesn't watch Watchmen?
Posted By REVOL 1 March 3, 2009 11:32:12 PM

I totally agree and feel the same, and yet, some people just don't sem to get it when I explain my position (probably not as well as outlined above). The context is everything. The medium for Moore's (and Gibbons') work is what makes it so engrossing and brilliant no matter how often we go back to it. It shows a level of depth, complexity and craft in a medium and on a subject still associated with children, and superficiality. Transfer it to the big screen and all you transfer is the story element. It's a great story, but it's not going to be the most important or stunning example of its medium - as a film - in the way it is as a book of sequential art, dialogue and prose. I'm sure it might be an enjoyable and exciting film, but the filmic interpretation can't possibly equal the potency of the existing manifestation, and I feel its existence as a lesser object in another medium almost detracts from the original (in that it removes its uniquess as the only represntation of that story/those characters). Even if you hold stuff like Maus/DKR or anything else above it in comic terms, could the film be placed anywhere near, say, the top 100 moments of the development of cinema? Will it even be the best superhero movie produced to date? That's why I wish it was just the book, in this case. Looking forward to decent adaptations of Y the Last Man and stuff though. :0)

Re: Alternate Cover: Who doesn't watch Watchmen?
Posted By Kardwell 1 March 4, 2009 07:48:51 PM

Never interested in adaptations. If I loved a novel, or a comic, or a game, damned if I give a monkeys about Hollywood bowdlerizing it. I only ever enjoy these things when I go in with zero expectations and minimal care for the source material.
Post a Comment
 

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Broadband

Mobile Broadband

Compare over 100 mobile broadband & broadband deals online!

Mobile Phones

LG ArenaHTC Magic

Compare over 250 mobile phones &
52,000 deals!